Samsung Galaxy A54 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy A54 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $450 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 54/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 745,870).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 by 32 points (86/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A54
Performance 53
Display 80
Camera 47
Battery 44
Portability 55
Value for money 40
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Samsung Galaxy A54 better?
  • Lighter: 202g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $599

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 745870
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1008
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2758
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 47/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A54 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 32 points higher (86/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (78/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (84/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy A54: The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A54 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Samsung Exynos 1380 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 745870 3740528
Geekbench Single 1008 3041
Geekbench Multi 2758 9494
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 107
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, One UI 5.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 158.2×76.7×8.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 202 g 215 g
Launch price $450 $599
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A54
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 32MP
47
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A54
  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A54
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A54 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A54 Samsung Exynos 1380
54/100
745870 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +80.1%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy A54 by 80.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A54
$450
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Launch price difference: $149. Samsung Galaxy A54 was $149 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (94/100 vs 53/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (99/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (78/100 vs 47/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (85/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 (84/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A54 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A54 by 32 points (86/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A54 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy A54 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A54 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 47/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A54 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 53/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A54 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.