Samsung Galaxy A53 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy A53 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1280, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $450 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 47/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 613,957); the Samsung Galaxy A53 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 by 39 points (86/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A53
Performance 47
Display 80
Camera 26
Battery 44
Portability 64
Value for money 26
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Samsung Galaxy A53 better?
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 189g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $599

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 613957
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 957
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2095
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A53 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 39 points higher (86/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A53 — 26/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (94/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (78/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A53 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (64/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy A53: The Samsung Galaxy A53 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A53 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Samsung Exynos 1280 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 613957 3740528
Geekbench Single 957 3041
Geekbench Multi 2095 9494
Display 6.5" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 79
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, One UI 4.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 159.6×74.8×8.1 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 189 g 215 g
Launch price $450 $599
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A53
  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 32MP
26
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A53
  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A53
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A53 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280
47/100
613957 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +83.6%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy A53 by 83.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A53
$450
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Launch price difference: $149. Samsung Galaxy A53 was $149 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (94/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (99/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (78/100 vs 26/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 (85/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A53 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (64/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A53 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A53 by 39 points (86/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A53 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy A53 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A53 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 26/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A53 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A53 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy A53 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.