Samsung Galaxy A50 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Samsung Galaxy A50 (2019) runs on the Exynos 9610, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 31/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 25 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 352,871); the Samsung Galaxy A50 is noticeably lighter (166g vs 204g).
Samsung Galaxy A50
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Lighter: 166g vs 204g
- Better portability (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 352871
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 370
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1021
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 25MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 22/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A50 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 40 points higher (71/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (69/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (69/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (86/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (56/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A50 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (83/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A50 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 9610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 352871 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 370 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1021 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Main camera | 25 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 25 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 158.5×74.7×7.7 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $350 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Main: 25MP
- Front: 25MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy A50 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Samsung Galaxy A50 by 72.7% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (69/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (80/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (86/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (56/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A50 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (83/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A50 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 by 40 points (71/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A50 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A50 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 22/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A50 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (69/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A50 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.