Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Both devices score the same overall rating of 71/100. Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,290,942); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 8.4mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 69/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 45/100)
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition received the same MobileRank rating — 71/100. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (76/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4453 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1828x2584 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 141.6% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (76/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
Both devices scored 71/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.