Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 71/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,294,871); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4188
- Lighter: 201g vs 204g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 68/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 3 points higher (74/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (98/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (74/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 4188 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1828x2448 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 / One UI 9 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 205.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (98/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (74/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.