Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A50 (2019) runs on the Exynos 9610, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $350 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 31/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 25 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 352,871); the Samsung Galaxy A50 is noticeably lighter (166g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A50
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 166g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $950
- Better portability (83/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 352871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 370
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1021
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 25MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 22/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A50 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 60 points higher (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A50 — 2/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (99/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (96/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (85/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A50 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (83/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A50 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 9610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 352871 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 370 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1021 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 25 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 25 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.5×74.7×7.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $350 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Main: 25MP
- Front: 25MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A50 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A50 by 91.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $600. Samsung Galaxy A50 was $600 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (99/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (89/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (96/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (85/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A50 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (83/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 by 60 points (91/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 22/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A50 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.