Samsung Galaxy A40 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy A40 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7904, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $250 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 25/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3100); the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 241,600); the Samsung Galaxy A40 is noticeably lighter (140g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 by 59 points (84/100 vs 25/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A40
Performance 19
Display 51
Camera 17
Battery 12
Portability 84
Value for money 2
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A40 better?
  • Lighter: 140g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $650

  • Better portability (84/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 241600
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 330
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 975
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 17/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A40 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 59 points higher (84/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A40 — 2/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (92/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (78/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (73/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (84/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy A40: The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A40 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Samsung Exynos 7904 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 241600 3119308
Geekbench Single 330 3041
Geekbench Multi 975 9494
Display 5.9" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3100 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 120W
Main camera 16 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 25 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 144.4×69.2×7.9 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 140 g 207 g
Launch price $250 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A40
  • Main: 16MP
  • Front: 25MP
17
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A40
  • 5.9" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A40
  • 3100 mAh
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A40 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A40 Samsung Exynos 7904
25/100
241600 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +92.3%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy A40 by 92.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A40
$250
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Launch price difference: $400. Samsung Galaxy A40 was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (92/100 vs 19/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (78/100 vs 17/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (73/100 vs 12/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (84/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A40 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 by 59 points (84/100 vs 25/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A40 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 17/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A40 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 19/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A40 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.