Samsung Galaxy A37 vs Vivo X300s
The Samsung Galaxy A37 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1480, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $250 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 53/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,031,048); the Samsung Galaxy A37 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 217g).
Samsung Galaxy A37
Vivo X300s
- Lighter: 180g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $723
- Better portability (78/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1031048
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1140
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3346
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A37 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 36 points higher (89/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A37 — 58/100, Vivo X300s — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (94/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (83/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A37 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1031048 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1140 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3346 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1900 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×78.2×7.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 180 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $723 |
Samsung Galaxy A37
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A37 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy A37 by 72.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $473. Samsung Galaxy A37 was $473 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (94/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (94/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (94/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (83/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A37 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 by 36 points (89/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A37 and the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy A37 has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A37 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A37 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A37 over the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy A37 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.