Samsung Galaxy A37 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A37 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1480, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $250 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 53/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,031,048); the Samsung Galaxy A37 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A37
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 180g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $950
- Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1031048
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1140
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3346
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A37 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 38 points higher (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A37 — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (85/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A37 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1480 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1031048 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1140 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3346 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1900 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×78.2×7.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A37
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A37 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A37 by 75.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $700. Samsung Galaxy A37 was $700 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (99/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (89/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (85/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A37 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 by 38 points (91/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A37 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A37 has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A37 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A37 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A37 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A37 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.