Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A34 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1080, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $400 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 50/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 729,766); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 92); the Samsung Galaxy A34 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A34
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $950
- Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 729766
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1032
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2507
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A34 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 41 points higher (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A34 — 38/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A34 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 729766 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1032 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2507 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×78.1×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $400 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Main: 48MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A34
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A34
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A34 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A34 by 82.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $550. Samsung Galaxy A34 was $550 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (99/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (96/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 (85/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A34 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A34 by 41 points (91/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A34 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 36/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A34 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.