Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 vs Vivo Y77 (China)

The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 9/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y77 (China) has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 2350); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is noticeably lighter (138g vs 194g).

The Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 by 20 points (29/100 vs 9/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 0
Design 100
Value for money 86
Vivo Y77 (China)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 39
Design 57
Value for money 55
What makes Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 better?
  • Lighter: 138g vs 194g

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
  • Bigger battery: 4500 vs 2350 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (39/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 20 points higher (29/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (86/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017: The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo Y77 (China): The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Vivo Y77 (China)
Processor Samsung Exynos 7870 MediaTek Dimensity 930
AnTuTu 192269
Geekbench Single 172
Geekbench Multi 492
Display 4.7" Super AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1280x720 1080x2388
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 2350 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 15W 80W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 2GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 16GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 6.0 Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
NFC yes no
Protection IP68
Dimensions 135.4×66.2×7.9 mm 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm
Weight 138 g 194 g
Price $349
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
  • Main: 13MP f/1.9
  • Front: 8MP
0
camera
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
  • 4.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x720
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
  • 2350 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
39
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
$349
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (24/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (39/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 57/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (86/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 by 20 points (29/100 vs 9/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Vivo Y77 (China) leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.