Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 9/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 2350); the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is noticeably lighter (138g vs 179g).
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Vivo Y32t
- Lighter: 138g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 2350 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 2 points higher (11/100 vs 9/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7870 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 192269 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 172 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 492 | — | |
| Display | 4.7" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 2350 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | — | |
| Storage | 16GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 6.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 135.4×66.2×7.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 138 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $349 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- Main: 13MP f/1.9
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- 4.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- 2350 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.