Samsung Galaxy A27 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A27 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A27 leads — 30/100 vs 11/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A27 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A27
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (29/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A27 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A27 scores 19 points higher (30/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 leads (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A27 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 849080 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1015 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2920 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.5 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×78.6×7.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy A27
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A27
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A27
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A27 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A27 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A27 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 leads on camera score (29/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A27 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.