Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Spark 50
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Spark 50 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. Both devices score the same overall rating of 30/100. Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark 50 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Spark 50
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 210g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 43/100)
The Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50 received the same MobileRank rating — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 leads (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Spark 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 550018 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 803 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1576 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16, HIOS 16 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 167.9×79.3×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Spark 50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Spark 50
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1576
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 50
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Spark 50?
Both devices scored 30/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Tecno Spark 50.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 50?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Spark 50 — 30/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Spark 50?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark 50 is a better fit for everyday use.