Vivo Y32t vs Xiaomi 13 Lite
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the Xiaomi 13 Lite (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 13 Lite leads — 35/100 vs 11/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 13 Lite has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Xiaomi 13 Lite is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.3mm).
Vivo Y32t
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 35/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 171g vs 179g
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (86/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the Xiaomi 13 Lite, the Xiaomi 13 Lite scores 24 points higher (35/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Xiaomi 13 Lite are nearly equal (36/100 vs 35/100). In the "design" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | Xiaomi 13 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 840330 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1039 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2885 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 67W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 159.2×72.7×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 171 g | |
| Price | — | $400 |
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (37/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Xiaomi 13 Lite are nearly equal (36/100 vs 35/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite is a bit better (86/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 24 points (35/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Xiaomi 13 Lite — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32t or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Xiaomi 13 Lite leads on camera score (37/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the Xiaomi 13 Lite?
The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 13 Lite is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.