Samsung Galaxy A26 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $182 and $834. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 51/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 749,719); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A26
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 200g vs 226g
- Cheaper: $182 vs $834
- Better portability (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 749719
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2758
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 70/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A26 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (87/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (93/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (86/100 vs 70/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A26 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 749719 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2758 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $182 | $834 |
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A26 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 77.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $652. Samsung Galaxy A26 is cheaper by $652.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (93/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (86/100 vs 70/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 36 points (87/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A26 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A26 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.