Samsung Galaxy A24 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A24 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A24 leads — 26/100 vs 11/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 195g).
Samsung Galaxy A24
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (29/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 195g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A24 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A24 scores 15 points higher (26/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 leads (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (76/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (94/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A24 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 408000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $229 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A24
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A24
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A24
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (76/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (94/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A24 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 leads on camera score (29/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.