Samsung Galaxy A24 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A24 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $229 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 47/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 552,286); the Samsung Galaxy A24 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A24
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $950
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A24 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 44 points higher (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A24 — 52/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A24 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $229 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A24
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A24
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A24
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A24 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A24 by 87.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $721. Samsung Galaxy A24 was $721 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (99/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (89/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 (85/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 by 44 points (91/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A24 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.