Samsung Galaxy A17 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $147 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 552,286); the Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A17
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 190g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $147 vs $899
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A17 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (86/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A17 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $147 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A17 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A17 by 83.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $752. Samsung Galaxy A17 was $752 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (93/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (86/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A17 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.