Samsung Galaxy A14 4G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G80, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 37/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 318,039); the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy A14 4G better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 318039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 406
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1456
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 28/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 54 points higher (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (99/100 vs 28/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A14 4G | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G80 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 318039 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 406 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1456 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI Core 5 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A14 4G and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A14 4G by 92.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (99/100 vs 28/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (89/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G by 54 points (91/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 4G has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 28/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 4G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.