Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (2021) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 29/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 234,339); the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is noticeably lighter (205g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho by 62 points (91/100 vs 29/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
Performance 16
Display 39
Camera 31
Battery 43
Portability 46
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho better?
  • Lighter: 205g vs 230g

  • Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 234339
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 836
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 62 points higher (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (99/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).

Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho: The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Exynos 850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 234339 4247433
Geekbench Single 300 3640
Geekbench Multi 836 11033
Display 6.5" PLS IPS 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 15W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11, One UI 3.1 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 164.0×75.8×8.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 205 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
  • Main: 48MP f/f/2.0
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 8MP
31
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
  • 6.5" PLS IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho Exynos 850
29/100
234339 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +94.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho by 94.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (99/100 vs 16/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (89/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (96/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho (85/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho by 62 points (91/100 vs 29/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 16/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.