Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A11 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 20/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 176,718).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A11
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy A11 better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 831 vs 779
- Lighter: 177g vs 179g
- Better portability (73/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 176718
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 301
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 13/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A11 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 8 points higher (28/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 13/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 is a bit better (73/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A11 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 176718 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 301 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 831 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×76.3×8.0 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A11
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A11 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Samsung Galaxy A11 by 41.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 13/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (52/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 is a bit better (73/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy A11 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A11 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A11 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 13/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A11 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 25/100).