Samsung Galaxy A07 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $120 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 41/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 533,135); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A07 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A07 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 by 46 points (87/100 vs 41/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A07
Performance 43
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 44
Portability 67
Value for money 64
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy A07 better?
  • Lighter: 184g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $899

  • Better portability (67/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 533135
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A07 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 46 points higher (87/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A07 — 64/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (67/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy A07: The Samsung Galaxy A07 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A07 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 533135 3269794
Geekbench Single 727 3228
Geekbench Multi 2047 9553
Display 6.7" PLS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1600x720 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 184 g 226 g
Launch price $120 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A07
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A07
  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A07
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A07 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A07 MediaTek Helio G99
41/100
533135 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +83.7%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A07 by 83.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A07
$120
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $779. Samsung Galaxy A07 was $779 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (93/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (84/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 (81/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (67/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A07 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 by 46 points (87/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A07 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A07 has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A07 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A07 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A07 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A07 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.