Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 65/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,041,898).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6150 mAh
- Overall rating 65/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1041898
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1223
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3168
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 211g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 70/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 19 points higher (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) are nearly equal (73/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1041898 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1223 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3168 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2772 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×78.3×7.9 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 211 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) by 66.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (91/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) are nearly equal (73/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.