Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 65/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,041,898); the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is noticeably lighter (211g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 211g vs 226g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1041898
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1223
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3168
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 23 points higher (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1041898 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1223 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3168 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2772 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×78.3×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 211 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) by 68.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (94/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (96/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.