Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,041,898); the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is noticeably lighter (211g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) better?
- Lighter: 211g vs 227g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1041898
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1223
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3168
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 70/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1041898 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1223 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3168 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2772 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×78.3×7.9 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 211 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) by 77.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (99/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) (92/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.