Redmi Note 14 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $288 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5110); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 917,150); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 103); the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Performance 58
Display 83
Camera 44
Battery 67
Portability 45
Value for money 60

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Redmi Note 14 Pro+ better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Lighter: 210g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $288 vs $950

  • Better portability (45/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 917150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1168
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3234
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5110 mAh

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 44/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 67/100). Value score: Redmi Note 14 Pro+ — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (85/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 917150 4247433
Geekbench Single 1168 3639
Geekbench Multi 3234 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2712x1220 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5110 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 120W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 103 170
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / HyperOS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.5×74.7×8.7 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 210 g 230 g
Launch price $288 $950

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
44
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

  • 5110 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
67
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 14 Pro+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
59/100
917150 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +78.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 14 Pro+ by 78.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

$288

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $662. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ was $662 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (96/100 vs 44/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (85/100 vs 67/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 44/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.