Redmi Note 14 Pro+ vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $288 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 59/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5110); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 917,150); the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (210g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Performance 58
Display 83
Camera 44
Battery 67
Portability 45
Value for money 60

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Redmi Note 14 Pro+ better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 210g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $288 vs $799

  • Better portability (45/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 917150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1168
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3234
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5110 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 44/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 30 points higher (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 67/100). Value score: Redmi Note 14 Pro+ — 60/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ is a bit better (45/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 917150 4602290
Geekbench Single 1168 3639
Geekbench Multi 3234 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2712x1220 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5110 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 120W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 103 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / HyperOS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.5×74.7×8.7 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 210 g 227 g
Launch price $288 $799

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
44
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

  • 5110 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
67
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 14 Pro+ and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
59/100
917150 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +80.1%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 14 Pro+ by 80.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 14 Pro+

$288

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $511. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ was $511 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (78/100 vs 44/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (92/100 vs 67/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ is a bit better (45/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 44/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.