Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $293 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,015,859); the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (205g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 13 Pro+ better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Lighter: 205g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $293 vs $950
- Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1015859
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1119
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2690
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 Pro+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1015859 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1119 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2690 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 / MIUI 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.2×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $293 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 Pro+ by 76.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $657. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ was $657 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (96/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 48/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.