Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $293 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 59/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,015,859); the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (205g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 13 Pro+ better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $293 vs $799
- Better portability (46/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1015859
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1119
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2690
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 30 points higher (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 Pro+ | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1015859 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1119 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2690 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 / MIUI 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.2×8.9 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $293 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 Pro+ by 77.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $506. Redmi Note 13 Pro+ was $506 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (78/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ (92/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 48/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.