Redmi Note 10 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Redmi Note 10 Pro (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $280 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 526,647); the Redmi Note 10 Pro is noticeably lighter (193g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 10 Pro
Performance 42
Display 85
Camera 41
Battery 53
Portability 62
Value for money 48
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Redmi Note 10 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 193g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $950

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 526647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 753
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1808
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5020 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 41/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 10 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Redmi Note 10 Pro — 48/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 10 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (96/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).

Redmi Note 10 Pro: The Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 10 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 526647 4247433
Geekbench Single 753 3640
Geekbench Multi 1808 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5020 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 108 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP53 IP69
Dimensions 164.0×76.5×8.1 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 193 g 230 g
Launch price $280 $950
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 10 Pro
  • Main: 108MP
  • Front: 16MP
41
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 10 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 10 Pro
  • 5020 mAh
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 10 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
51/100
526647 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +87.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 10 Pro by 87.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 10 Pro
$280
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $670. Redmi Note 10 Pro was $670 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (99/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 10 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (96/100 vs 41/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (85/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 10 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 10 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 10 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 10 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 41/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 10 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 10 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.