Redmi Note 10 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi Note 10 Pro (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $280 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 51/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 526,647); the Redmi Note 10 Pro is noticeably lighter (193g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro by 38 points (89/100 vs 51/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 10 Pro
Performance 42
Display 85
Camera 41
Battery 53
Portability 62
Value for money 48
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Redmi Note 10 Pro better?
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 193g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $799

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 526647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 753
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1808
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5020 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 41/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 10 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 38 points higher (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Redmi Note 10 Pro — 48/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (78/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (62/100 vs 35/100).

Redmi Note 10 Pro: The Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 10 Pro Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 526647 4602290
Geekbench Single 753 3640
Geekbench Multi 1808 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5020 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP53 IP68
Dimensions 164.0×76.5×8.1 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 193 g 227 g
Launch price $280 $799
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 10 Pro
  • Main: 108MP
  • Front: 16MP
41
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 10 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 10 Pro
  • 5020 mAh
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 10 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
51/100
526647 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +88.6%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 10 Pro by 88.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 10 Pro
$280
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Launch price difference: $519. Redmi Note 10 Pro was $519 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (99/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (78/100 vs 41/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro (92/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (62/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 10 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 Pro by 38 points (89/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 10 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 10 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 10 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 41/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 10 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 10 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.