Redmi K60 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Redmi K60 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $475 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 66/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 54 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,710,757); the Redmi K60 Pro is noticeably lighter (208g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K60 Pro
Performance 75
Display 90
Camera 37
Battery 75
Portability 48
Value for money 60
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Redmi K60 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Lighter: 208g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $475 vs $950

  • Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (48/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1710757
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 54MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K60 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 25 points higher (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 75/100). Value score: Redmi K60 Pro — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K60 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K60 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

Redmi K60 Pro: The Redmi K60 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K60 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1710757 4247433
Geekbench Single 2004 3640
Geekbench Multi 5311 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 3200x1440 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 120W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 54 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 162.8×75.4×8.6 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 208 g 230 g
Launch price $475 $950
Camera comparison
Redmi K60 Pro
  • Main: 54MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
37
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K60 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K60 Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 30W
75
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K60 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
66/100
1710757 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +59.7%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi K60 Pro by 59.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi K60 Pro
$475
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $475. Redmi K60 Pro was $475 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K60 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 75/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi K60 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K60 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K60 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi K60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K60 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K60 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K60 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Redmi K60 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.