Redmi K60 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Redmi K60 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $475 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 66/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 54 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,710,757); the Redmi K60 Pro is noticeably lighter (208g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K60 Pro
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Redmi K60 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Better main camera: 54MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 208g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $475 vs $840
- Better portability (48/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1710757
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 90/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi K60 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 23 points higher (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 75/100). Value score: Redmi K60 Pro — 54/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K60 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi K60 Pro | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1710757 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.4×8.6 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $475 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Redmi K60 Pro
- Main: 54MP f/1.89
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi K60 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi K60 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi K60 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Redmi K60 Pro by 68.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $365. Redmi K60 Pro was $365 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (78/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi K60 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K60 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi K60 Pro by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi K60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Redmi K60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi K60 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi K60 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Redmi K60 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Redmi K60 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.