Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Realme Narzo 50 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 49/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 750,481); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro doesn't; the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (181g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro by 20 points (69/100 vs 49/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Realme Narzo 50 Pro

Performance 51
Display 69
Camera 34
Battery 46
Portability 70
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Realme Narzo 50 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 181g vs 309g

  • Better portability (70/100 vs 20/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 750481
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 936
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2318
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (70/100 vs 69/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 20 points higher (69/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Realme Narzo 50 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 920 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 750481 2926532
Geekbench Single 936 3013
Geekbench Multi 2318 9287
Display 6.4" Super AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 2160x1584
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 16GB
Storage 128GB 512GB
OS Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 430 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP48
Dimensions 160.2×73.3×8.0 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 181 g 309 g
Launch price — $2899

Camera comparison

Realme Narzo 50 Pro

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Realme Narzo 50 Pro

  • 6.4" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
69
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Realme Narzo 50 Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Realme Narzo 50 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme Narzo 50 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 920
49/100
750481 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +74.4%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Realme Narzo 50 Pro by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Realme Narzo 50 Pro

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (90/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (52/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (63/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro by 20 points (69/100 vs 49/100).

What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Realme Narzo 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Realme Narzo 50 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.