Realme Neo7 Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $270 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads — 70/100 vs 69/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,560,650); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme Neo7 Turbo
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Realme Neo7 Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $270 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2560650
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 7478
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 84/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme Neo7 Turbo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Realme Neo7 Turbo scores 1 points higher (70/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (85/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Realme Neo7 Turbo — 86/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme Neo7 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2560650 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2233 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7478 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $270 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Realme Neo7 Turbo and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Realme Neo7 Turbo by 12.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2629. Realme Neo7 Turbo was $2629 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme Neo7 Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the Realme Neo7 Turbo over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.