Realme Neo7 Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $270 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 56/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,502,910); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Realme Neo7 Turbo
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $270 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (91/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2502910
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 2233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 7478
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 31/100)
Comparing the Realme Neo7 Turbo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 1 points higher (57/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (67/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (49/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Realme Neo7 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2502910 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2233 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7478 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $270 | $2899 |
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Realme Neo7 Turbo and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Realme Neo7 Turbo by 14.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2629. Realme Neo7 Turbo is cheaper by $2629.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (67/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (49/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (43/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Realme Neo7 Turbo by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme Neo7 Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme Neo7 Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Realme Neo7 Turbo over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.