Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 61/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 4600); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,420,808); the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is noticeably lighter (199g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 26 points (87/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

Performance 71
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 56
Portability 50
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Realme GT Neo 5 240W better?

  • Faster charging: 240W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 224g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1420808
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 4600 mAh

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 26 points higher (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (98/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).

Realme GT Neo 5 240W: The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Realme GT Neo 5 240W Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1420808 3950082
Geekbench Single 1761 3639
Geekbench Multi 4688 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1240x2772 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 240W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.9×75.8×8.9 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 199 g 224 g
Launch price — $892

Camera comparison

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1240x2772
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 240W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Realme GT Neo 5 240W and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme GT Neo 5 240W Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
61/100
1420808 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +64.0%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 64.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Realme GT Neo 5 240W

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (98/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (87/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (83/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 26 points (87/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Realme GT Neo 5 240W over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.