Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 90/100 vs 61/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 4600); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 1,425,446); the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is noticeably lighter (199g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 29 points (90/100 vs 61/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
Performance 71
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 56
Portability 50
Value for money
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Performance 98
Display 91
Camera 87
Battery 89
Portability 48
Value for money 92
What makes Realme GT Neo 5 240W better?
  • Faster charging: 240W vs 100W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 219g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 1425446
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 4600 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 2160Hz vs 144Hz

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 29 points higher (90/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (98/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).

Realme GT Neo 5 240W: The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Realme GT Neo 5 240W Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1425446 3998145
Geekbench Single 1761 3640
Geekbench Multi 4688 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1240x2772 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 2160 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 240W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 159
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 Android 16, HyperOS 3
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.9×75.8×8.9 mm 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm
Weight 199 g 219 g
Launch price $999
Camera comparison
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1240x2772
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 2160 Hz
91
display
Battery and charging
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 240W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • 7500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Realme GT Neo 5 240W and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme GT Neo 5 240W Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
61/100
1425446 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
90/100 +64.3%
3998145 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 64.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
Price unknown
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
$999
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (98/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (87/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W (89/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme GT Neo 5 240W by 29 points (90/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme GT Neo 5 240W or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Realme GT Neo 5 240W over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Realme GT Neo 5 240W is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.