Poco X7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $369 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 64/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,884,839); the Poco X7 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco X7 Pro
Performance 75
Display 83
Camera 37
Battery 65
Portability 59
Value for money 68
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Poco X7 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 230g
  • Cheaper: $369 vs $950

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1884839
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6100
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better value for money (94/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco X7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 27 points higher (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (94/100 vs 68/100).

Poco X7 Pro: The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco X7 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1884839 4247433
Geekbench Single 1579 3640
Geekbench Multi 6100 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2712x1220 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 90W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / HyperOS 2 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 230 g
Price $369 $950
Camera comparison
Poco X7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Poco X7 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Poco X7 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
65
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco X7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
64/100
1884839 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +55.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco X7 Pro by 55.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Poco X7 Pro
$369
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Price difference: $581. Poco X7 Pro is cheaper by $581.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (85/100 vs 65/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (94/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco X7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Poco X7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Poco X7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco X7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco X7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Poco X7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.