Poco X7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $369 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 64/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,874,182); the Poco X7 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco X7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco X7 Pro better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $369 vs $950
- Better portability (59/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1874182
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco X7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 27 points higher (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Poco X7 Pro — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco X7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1874182 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / HyperOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $369 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco X7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco X7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco X7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco X7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco X7 Pro by 55.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $581. Poco X7 Pro was $581 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (85/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (59/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco X7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco X7 Pro by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Poco X7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco X7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco X7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco X7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Poco X7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.