Poco M7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco M7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $220 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 57/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5110); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 879,714); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M7 Pro doesn't; the Poco M7 Pro is noticeably lighter (180g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco M7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco M7 Pro better?
- Lighter: 180g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $950
- Better portability (72/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5110 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 70/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco M7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 34 points higher (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Poco M7 Pro — 70/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Poco M7 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco M7 Pro (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco M7 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco M7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5110 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $220 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco M7 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco M7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco M7 Pro
- 5110 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco M7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco M7 Pro by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $730. Poco M7 Pro was $730 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Poco M7 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco M7 Pro (85/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco M7 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco M7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 Pro by 34 points (91/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Poco M7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco M7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco M7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco M7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Poco M7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.