Poco F5 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $330 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,269,172); the Poco F5 is noticeably lighter (181g vs 230g).
Poco F5
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 181g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $330 vs $950
- Better portability (71/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1269172
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1653
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4349
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Poco F5 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Poco F5 — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F5 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (71/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Poco F5 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1269172 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1653 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4349 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.9×7.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 181 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $330 | $950 |
Poco F5
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F5
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F5
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Poco F5 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F5 by 70.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $620. Poco F5 was $620 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 (99/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F5 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (71/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Poco F5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F5 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F5 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Poco F5 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F5 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.