Poco F5 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F5 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $450 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,420,808); the Poco F5 Pro is noticeably lighter (204g vs 230g).
Poco F5 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 204g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $950
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 67/100)
Comparing the Poco F5 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 67/100). Value score: Poco F5 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F5 Pro (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 Pro (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F5 Pro (85/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F5 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Poco F5 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.4×8.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $950 |
Poco F5 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F5 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F5 Pro
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Poco F5 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F5 Pro by 66.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Poco F5 Pro was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F5 Pro (99/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 Pro (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F5 Pro (85/100 vs 67/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F5 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Poco F5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F5 Pro by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Poco F5 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F5 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.