Poco F2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Poco F2 Pro (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $500 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 52/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 978,910).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F2 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Poco F2 Pro better?
- Lighter: 219g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $899
- Overall rating 52/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 978910
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1169
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3191
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F2 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Poco F2 Pro — 26/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F2 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 978910 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1169 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3191 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.4×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F2 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.89
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F2 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F2 Pro
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F2 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Poco F2 Pro by 70.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $399. Poco F2 Pro was $399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (94/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (84/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (81/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco F2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Poco F2 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.