Poco F2 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Poco F2 Pro (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $500 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 52/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 978,910).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F2 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Poco F2 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 219g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $548
- Better camera (46/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 978910
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1169
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3191
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 59/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F2 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 23 points higher (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F2 Pro leads (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Poco F2 Pro — 26/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (95/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (99/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F2 Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 38/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F2 Pro | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 978910 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1169 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3191 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.4×8.9 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Poco F2 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.89
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Poco F2 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F2 Pro
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F2 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Poco F2 Pro by 72.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $48. Poco F2 Pro was $48 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (95/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (99/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F2 Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 38/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro by 23 points (75/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F2 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Poco F2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Poco F2 Pro leads on camera score (46/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Poco F2 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.