Poco C95 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Poco C95 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $253 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 38/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7500); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 354,158); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is noticeably lighter (212g vs 232g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C95 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Poco C95 Pro better?
- Cheaper at launch: $253 vs $280
- Overall rating 38/100
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 354158
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 405
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 1407
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 212g vs 232g
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C95 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 33 points higher (71/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Poco C95 Pro — 26/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (88/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (73/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (50/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C95 Pro | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 354158 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 405 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1407 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 170.1×78.4×8.8 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $253 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C95 Pro
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C95 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Poco C95 Pro by 87.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $27. Poco C95 Pro was $27 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (88/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (94/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (73/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (50/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 33 points (71/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C95 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Poco C95 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C95 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.