Poco C75 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Poco C75 (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 32/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Poco C75
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (40/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 26/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 5 points higher (37/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 leads (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C75 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | — | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 204 g | — | |
| Price | $116 | — |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (81/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (40/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Poco C75 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.