Poco C65 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads — 70/100 vs 33/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 348,562).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 37 points (70/100 vs 33/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco C65

Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 63
Value for money 56

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Poco C65 better?

  • Lighter: 192g vs 204g

  • Better portability (63/100 vs 52/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 348562
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 1031
  • Faster charging: 65W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 43/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C65 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra scores 37 points higher (70/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (68/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (68/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco C65 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 348562 1294871
Geekbench Single 375 1662
Geekbench Multi 1031 4188
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1600x720 1116x2480
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 65W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 / HyperOS Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 192 g 204 g
Launch price $99 —

Camera comparison

Poco C65

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Poco C65

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Poco C65

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco C65 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
33/100
348562 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
70/100 +73.1%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads Poco C65 by 73.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco C65

$99

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (68/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (80/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (86/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco C65 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 37 points (70/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on performance (68/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Poco C65 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.