Poco C65 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 25/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Poco C65
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 194g
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 57/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 4 points higher (29/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 194 g | |
| Price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the Poco C65 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.