Poco C65 vs Vivo Y32t
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C65 leads — 25/100 vs 11/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Poco C65
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Poco C65 scores 14 points higher (25/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Poco C65 (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Poco C65 (76/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Poco C65 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Poco C65 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.