Poco C65 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 25/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the Poco C65 is thinner (8.1mm vs 9.2mm).
Poco C65
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Lighter: 192g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 46/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 6 points higher (31/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Poco C65 (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 203 g | |
| Price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Poco C65 (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) edges out the Poco C65 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.