Poco C40 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 11/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco C40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't.
Poco C40
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Overall rating 11/100
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 203g vs 204g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (46/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 20 points higher (31/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Poco C40 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Poco C40 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Poco C40 | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the Poco C40 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Poco C40 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 20 points (31/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.